Friday, October 24, 2014

Using Our Lives

This not my work.
This is a speech from an online class I took (I have others if you look at some of my earlier posts). 
 I was waiting for a title but it's been a while and I figured it was about time this got up here.
------------------------

How can one define a life's worth? How can its merits be given value and its actions cost? When an object is given worth,  it is valued upon its use. But can the same evaluation be made of a person?
            When an experiment is made in science, the results must be placed in specific parameters. The scientist in question must be able to take something as fluid as emotion or opinion and turn it into something which has a specific set of characteristics. For example, if a scientist were to evaluate intelligence, he must be able to set a specific group of things to look for, such as problem solving, mental speed and so on. Only if results can made devoid of opinion, either of researcher or viewer, can they be trusted.
            But what values would be chosen to make such a search of human worth? Would they be physical characteristics? Or would they instead be in terms of ability to understand and memorize information? But what then of problem solving abilities, or the arts? Even taking every value here stated would be an incomplete list, and many would be difficult to put in specific parameters.
            What then, can one do to define the worth of a person? Can it be done? It has been tried without success many times, from placing a price on a slave to human IQ.
            A life cannot be given a specific worth, but the worth it has can be raised. After all, a life does have worth, even if it cannot be measured. That worth could therefore be increased by increasing those things that give it worth. What, then, is the way to achieve highest worth in life?
            To change a piece of iron into a sword, a smith must work to heat and bend the metal into the shape which he desires. Likewise, to turn a mere talent, which is good, into a true skill, we must work to bend it into the shape we desire. Just as a sword is more useful than a simple piece of iron, a skill is more useful than a talent.
            But the more important question than how to increase worth is why to increase worth. What use does it serve?
            To quote Aristotle from his book Nicomachean Ethics:

            "Every art and every scientific inquiry, and similiarly every action and purpose, may be said to aim at some good. Hence the good has been well defined as that at which all things aim. But it is clear that there is a difference in ends;foor the ends are sometimes activities, and sometimes results beyond the mere activities. Where there are ends beyond the action, the results are naturally superior to the action.
            "If it is true that in the sphere of action there is some end which we wish for its own sake, and for the sake of which we wish everything else, and if we do not desire everything for the sake of something else (for if it were so, the process would go on ad infinitum and our desire will be idle and futile), clearly this end will be good and the supreme good."

            He then names the ultimate good as happiness.
            Having knowledge of the ultimate good gives people the ability to reach that good, much like an archer aiming for a target. Therefore we must strive to achieve that ultimate good, which is happiness. The next question is what must be done to get to that goal. Just as an archer must know to pull back the bowstring, and how to aim and so forth, we must know how to get to happiness. What is it that gets us there? Would it be the same for each person?
            Happiness does not reside in material wealth of possessions, nor is it found in fame or prestige. Otherwise, how could musicians and artists, most of whom never obtain money or fame, be happy? In fact, how could any but the very elite be happy? And yet, many people are. No, happiness must lie elsewhere.
            Happiness lies in the fulfillment of the measure of our creation, or doing what we are meant to do. Those who are best at science, or music, or craftsmanship can all be happy if it is what they are meant to be doing. Therefore, we must find that which we were created to do. We must do that which we were created to do. For when we do it, we will obtain happiness.

Thursday, October 9, 2014

The Hunger Games

Spolier alert.
I'll be kind of jumping around on topics, just so you know.
------
Suzanne Collins. First Hunger Games book published on September 14th 2008. Second on September 9th 2009. Final book on August 24th 2010.
Hunger Games movie: March 2012. Catching Fire movie: November 2013. Mockingjay Part 1: November 2014. Mockingjay Part 2: November 2015. 

Hunger Games is three part book series by Suzanne Collins. The series is liked by many people, probably worldwide but I don't know that for sure.
The setting is in a dystopian world with strange rules, problems and a corrupt government.
Hunger Games is an adventure. It's a romance. It's a life changer if you know how to recognize it.

Reading the book I remember thinking about all the events and wondering what it would be like to actually live there. And I'm pretty sure I would be the first to die if I was ever picked as a tribute.
And thinking about that, can you imagine how messed up the government was? They were practically sending kids to their deaths. How wrong is that?
But then you have to remember that everyone was used to it (scary thought). I mean, they grew up doing that.
And nobody really thought otherwise.
Think about that; you've grown up seeing people getting killed. you're really not very well off (especially if you're in District 12).

I put Panem into Google Translate, Latin into English, and it means bread or the bread. That name is probably significant but I don't know in what way.

At the end of the series I find it super interesting that Katniss votes in flavor for more Hunger Games. Peta votes against it. It seems that Peta better understood what harm the games did and he seemed to have forgiven the Capital. Not an easy thing to do.
Katniss chooses for the Games to continue. Not because she's evil or unfeeling. Because she's hurt and lost friends, family, good people, innocent people died. That would be a pretty tough decision to make.
What would you have chosen? Or, I guess a better way to say that is, what would want to choose? We never really know until it happens. (Of course, something like this will never happen. Or should happen.) Would you have chosen to continue having annual Games?
I can't say I would blame you too much if you did. I mean, talk about sorrow, pain and loss. War brings all of that. But it also brings love, compassion and friendship.

The Hunger Games is a series that you really has you thinking and I wouldn't recommend reading it unless you're 12 at least. It's a great series but there's a lot to think about and take in.